Myths and Facts: A Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict by Mitchell G. BardA revised and updated version of the classic guide to the Arab-Israeli conflict including the road map for peace and disengagement from Gaza. Israels roots. The Arab-Israeli wars. The United Nations. The refugees. The treatment of Jews in Arab/Islamic countries. Human rights in Israel and the territories. The Palestinian War. Jerusalem. U.S. Middle East policy. The peace process. Settlements. The arms balance. The media. Arab/Muslim attitudes toward Israel. New maps and charts.--P.  of cover.
Myths and Facts about Israel’s controversial new Nation-State law
Few ideas are as deeply ingrained in Israeli culture as the one summed up by the Hebrew phrase ''meatim mul rabim,'' or ''the few against the many. But the start of this school year marks a quiet revolution in the teaching of Israeli history to most Israeli pupils. New, officially approved textbooks make plain that many of the most common Israeli beliefs are as much myth as fact. The new books say, for example, that it was the Israelis who had the military edge in the War of Independence. They say that many Palestinians left their land not -- as has traditionally been taught -- because they smugly expected the Arab states to sweep back victoriously, but because they were afraid, and in some cases expelled by Israeli soldiers. The books freely use the word ''Palestinian'' to refer to a people and a nationalist movement, unheard of in the previous texts.
To support our efforts to separate the Myths from the Facts please click here. Myths and Facts, Inc. Close Move. Arab losses caused by unlawful acts of aggression in About legal authority and enforcement power.
Yet upon closer examination much of the criticism appears to be based upon misinterpretations and assumptions that go beyond the actual wording of the law. The law, it must be stressed outright, is purely declarative in nature and carries with it no practical impact on Israeli life. Rather, it is an overwhelmingly symbolic reaction to those who object to the continued existence of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. Today we made it law: This is our nation, language and flag. Similar constitutional provisions emphasising national self-determination and cultural expression can be found in numerous countries in Europe and elsewhere. Claims that the law harms the prospects for a two-state peace outcome are simply bizarre — since , partition has always been discussed in terms of a Jewish state existing alongside an Arab state.
The Knesset Plenary Hall during speeches ahead of the vote on the National Law, which will enforce the foundation of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish people, on July 18,
work with coach bob reviews
In this op-ed, Mohammad S. Contrary to their presupposition, the international community, including the European Union, UK, Russia, Japan, and China, took a tough stand against the U. To cap it all, the Palestinian National Authority officially revoked its approval of the U. Besides, the continuous broadcasting of live video footages showing the detained, injured, and gunned down Palestinians on all international news channels, the main topic of many political talk shows and web-based media revolved time and again around the same old opposing claims to land rights of the holy land and Jerusalem. Throughout the last seven decades up to this time, similar complex political discourse often tends to provoke heated disputes of legitimacy and legality between the Israelis and Palestinians, most of which to corroborate each side claims to sovereignty over Jerusalem and Palestine. It prompts a rerun of the age-old arguments and counterarguments about the ancient flow of Semitic emigrants to the Levant, the role of foreign occupying forces in Palestine, and the like.
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below. Just click on the icons to get to the download page. Yet upon closer examination much of the criticism appears to be based upon misinterpretations and assumptions that go beyond the actual wording of the law. The law, it must be stressed outright, is purely declarative in nature and carries with it no practical impact on Israeli life. Rather, it is an overwhelmingly symbolic reaction to those who object to the continued existence of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.